
How many times have you sat in a Catholic Church and been subjected to the shrill shriek of a 40 or 50 something soprano who, aided and abetted in her foul act of musical vandalism by the parish organist, leads the congregation in song through a register of notes that only dogs can hear (and I say this as a tenor who is fortunate to be able to reach those lofty heights but can only look on helplessly as my fellow parishioners fall on either side of me, unable to maintain the pitch, in a gallant effort to "fully participate" in the liturgy). Whilst you could excuse the fact that most of these parish cantors (or is that a sexist term?) cantresses, just simply pitch the music beyond the range of the average Catholic congregation, you cannot excuse the dribble that these banshees scream/sing. A great many parishes in Australia use books such as "Gather Australia," "On Eagles Wings" etc all of which contain various hymns (often written by religious - notably Jesuits or Mercy Sisters) written specifically for the Novus Ordo Mass and it is these hymns that contain the "poignant" reflections of a Baby Boomer generation who just didn't seem to get it.
Let me give you an example "The Lord is my shepherd" Good so far; "...and I want to follow..." a noble sentiment to which all baptised Christians should aspire "...wherever He leads me, wherever we go..." such faithful trust "And while on the journey to where we are going..." Whoo, just put the tambourine down and step away from the guitar - what does that mean! Where else would you be going on a journey except to where you are going! Me thinks someone had too many beats in a bar and not much to say to fill them. Beautiful hymns written in English do exist (look at the Anglican musical tradition) and they can be used at a Novus Ordo Mass. The Living Parish Hymnal is an excellent example of this. Contained therein are pearls written by the great Australian poet James McCauley - there are even texts by John Henry Cardinal Newman set to music by Edward Elgar. And the beauty of this music is that any parish can sing it all - you can "Come as you Are." Of course not all old hymns are good hymns. Often enough the hymns of the '50's can smack of a saccharine sweet piety. So what is the criterion of good parish music? Quite simply, nobility. This is nobility both in the musical score and the lyrics.
A piece of music is noble if it allows a listener to experience the presence of God. God is experienced in the transcendental qualities of truth beauty and goodness. Sadly most modern liturgical music (and secular music for that matter) neither celebrates truth, nor is beautiful and consequently is rarely good. The problem lies in the fact that this music is not Christocentric
it does not concentrate on God. Rather it is egocentric it concentrates on the I, me. And so musical expression becomes subjective, emotive and for the most part shallow _ which isn't surprising, when liturgical musicians turn from the objective and infinite that is the praise of God.
In his book
"The Spirit of the Liturgy" at page 147 his eminence Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger notes
"three developments in recent music epitomize the problems that the Church has to face when she is considering liturgical music." He goes on to diagnose the problems firstly as cultural universalisation, which is necessary if the Church is to be more than a European institution. Secondly modern "classical" music has become the preserve of an elite musical oligarchy that only the "educated" may partake of. This problem is particularly rife amongst traditionalists within the Church who in their quest for artistic perfection have lost sight of the fact that Church music should remain an aid to worship as well as being an act of worship in and of itself. These people will not condescend to have congregations join in their music making for fear that somehow their art might be destroyed. Thirdly, popular music (that is "pop music" in a broad sense) in the antithetical problem. This music is mass produced and in large part is designed to give vent to bestial passion, allowing listeners to surrender their will to the rhythm, noise, flashing lights and mentality of the mob gathered at night clubs and rock concerts across the world in a hypnotic or hallucinogenic state. Essentially, popular music often discourages listeners from exercising their reason - their most noble God-given attribute.
Noble music should have universal appeal, in this sense it is truly "popular music". It should not be the preserve of either a European and/or musically educated few. Having said this, its popular appeal is not established because it celebrates the banal, nor because it allows individuals (or even a collection of individuals joining an artificially created "parish community") to celebrate themselves but rather noble music is popular music because it celebrates something great that is common to us all - it celebrates God in whom we all live, move and have our being.
As a final brief note to my diatribe I believe that the Church faces a fourth problem when considering liturgical music at this time. Music, like many liturgical actions, is promoted as a means of "active participation in the liturgy" to the exclusion of substantial participation in the liturgy. His Holiness, Pope Pius XII wrote in his encyclical
Mediator Dei at 104:
"They [the faithful] should not think it enough to participate in the Eucharistic sacrifice with that general intention that befits members of Christ and children of the Church, but let them further, in keeping with the spirit of the Sacred Liturgy, be most closely united with the High Priest and His earthly minister, at the time the consecration of the divine Victim is enacted, and at that time especially when those solemn words are pronounced, ' By Him, and with Him and in Him, is to Thee God, the Father almighty, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, all honour and glory for ever and ever;' to these words in fact the people answer 'Amen.' Nor should Christians forget to offer themselves, their cares, their sorrows, their distress and their necessities in union with their divine Saviour upon the cross." The Pope goes on to write at 106 that physical participation such as singing or responding to the Priest are actions that
"...foster and promote the people's piety and imitate union with Christ and His visible minister and to arouse those internal sentiments and dispositions which should make our hearts like to that of the High Priest of the New Testament." It is a participation from within that makes for substantial participation. Spiritual participation, the kind envisaged by the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council, wherein the faithful come to Mass in order to pray
this is true participation with Christ in His meditation between God and man that is the Mass. Reading from the Lectionary, acting as an Extraordinary Minister of Communion, serving at the altar, even singing or playing instruments these things are empty gestures if they are done to the exclusion of prayer. Prayer is the ultimate form of participation in the liturgy and those that recollect themselves to like Mary
vis-a-vis her sister Martha; they choose the better part. All the more reason then to fill our Churches with noble music - the kind that is conducive to prayer, recollection and the praise of God.
Well our musical banshee's cry continues to ring across the insipid lyrics of music that most resembles the self assessment or personal testimony of a psychiatric patient; the ravings of a "me" generation that just can't get over itself or the collection of multiple "mes" that make "parish community." Though your ears may now bleed, know this, nobility is possible even in the most humble parish church. Of course if you do loose hope remember that even our Lord drove those who defiled the sanctuary from the temple - and given the state of your ears, you won't hear the cries of protest.